China’s minister for environment signals tough stance on imports https://t.co/E8yMq1YgNE
The latest news in brief https://t.co/ypWMZ43dJ6
Agency points to RDF storage near food concerns https://t.co/GSo321OVOX
PRN income is designed to provide “top up” funding to make the process of collecting and recycling existing and increased tonnages of packaging waste viable. It is not intended to cover all the costs involved or to be sufficient to completely fund new systems or capacity.
The immediate beneficiaries of PRN funds are the accredited reprocessors and exporters that receive the packaging waste for recycling or recovery.
Approximately 67% of funds are used to support the collection and processing of the recyclate.
Accredited exporters and accredited reprocessors must show that PRN/PERN revenues are being used to:
• Develop the collection coverage and reprocessing market, e.g. new end markets for recycled materials
• Develop collection and sortation of packaging waste, e.g. new sorting technologies for better quality recyclate or new material streams
The pie charts below show how PRN/PERN revenue was spent by accredited reprocessors and exporters in 2016, based on data published by the Environment Agency. The full Environment Agency data set, which is available on the National Packaging Waste Database, can be found here.
As a supply and demand system, PRN prices, and therefore PRN revenue, can fluctuate each year according to the market conditions. There can also be substantial differences in funds depending on the material, as shown in the material specific charts below.
Infrastructure and capacity: This includes investment to equipment used for processing material, for example glass sorting plants that colour sort mixed glass and remove contaminants to allow use for remelt and higher grade applications.
Funding collection: For example enabling collectors to extend collection range or collect amounts which would otherwise not be economically viable to collect.
Reduction in price and developing new markets: This could for example include subsidising a product containing recycled material to allow the product to compete within the market.
Costs of complying with the regulations: Reprocessors are required to be pay fees to the enforcement authority each year for accreditation and will also have costs to maintain accurate records and generation of PRNs. NB: This does not include producer registration fees.
Retained for future investment: PRNs are generated throughout the year however sales do not complete until the following January, therefore reprocessors need to carry forward funds into the next year as they have not received them in the current year.
Developing communication strategies: This could include, for example, promotional leaflets to encourage recycling and supporting Local Authorities in specific recycling campaigns
Some examples of recent PRN investment by reprocessors as well as investment in recycling by packaging producers, compliance schemes and waste management companies can be found below:
Vanden expands Cambridgeshire plastics facility (July 2017)
Biffa to double HDPE milk bottle recycling capacity (April 2016)
ACP chair: Councils are seeing PRN money (October 2015)
Viridor opens £25m glass recycling facility (September 2015)
Biffa invests £3.1m in glass cleaning (June 2015)
Aluminium and recovery hit hard in Q1 packaging data (April 2015)
Ella’s Kitchen launches recycling initiative (March 2015)
PRNs ‘could drive up’ R1 registration (January 2015)
Plastics recycling trial targets trigger tops (December 2014)
Beatson Clark increases capacity with amber glass furnace (December 2014)
Packaging prowess (December 2014)
Pledge 4 Plastics recycling campaign launched (September 2014)
Recresco glass recycling plant set for Kent (April 2013)
Higher PRN prices boost glass recycling levels (January 2013)