letsrecycle.com

Refuse collector’s death leads to 130,000 fine for Veolia

Veolia Environmental Services (UK) Ltd has been fined £130,000 following an incident in Buckinghamshire which saw a worker killed when a 1,100 litre recycling bin fell on his head.

The fatal incident took place at Easington, near Aylesbury, in May 2004
The fatal incident took place at Easington, near Aylesbury, in May 2004
Veolia employee David Ives, 56, was collecting refuse outside a pub in Easington, near Aylesbury, on 5 May 2004 when the recycling bin fell from the bin hoist on the back of the refuse vehicle and landed on his head, killing him.

Aylesbury Crown Court found Veolia guilty last week (Thursday 11 February) under Sections 3 (1) and 2 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. In addition to the £130,000 fine, the firm was also ordered to pay £220,000 in costs.

Section 2(1) puts a duty on employers to ensure, as far as is practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all its employees, while 3(1) requires employers to ensure that, as far as reasonably practicable, that persons not in their employment are not exposed to health and safety risks.

Commenting on the case, Dennis MacWilliam, inspector at the Health and Safety Executive, said: “This was an extremely tragic incident which has now left Mr Ives' widow to continue life without a loving husband. It could have been avoided if only a few simple measures had been in place.

“Employers are legally required to make sure their equipment is regularly maintained and is fit for use by their workers. If the bin hoist on the recycling lorry had been maintained this incident would never have happened.”

Veolia

Responding to the fine, Veolia said it had “invested significantly” in training and equipment over the past five years, in a bid to reduce accidents and increase health and safety awareness.

Richard Berry, executive director of Veolia Environmental Services said: “No workplace accident is acceptable. Both legally and morally we have an obligation to take all reasonable steps to prevent such accidents.

“At the time we had many safeguards in place, but the jury has concluded that in this particular case our efforts did not meet the high standard required.”

Share this article with others

Subscribe for free

Subscribe to receive our newsletters and to leave comments.

Back to top

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest waste and recycling news straight to your inbox.

Subscribe
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.