letsrecycle.com

Recycling consistency drive ‘not a diktat’

A drive to improve recycling consistency in England is “not a diktat” for how local authorities should behave, WRAP director Marcus Gover has insisted.

(l-r): Andy Rees, Welsh Government's head of waste strategy, Linda Cricton, WRAP's head of resource management, Marcus Gover, WRAP director, and councillor Clyde Loakes, session chair

Speaking to delegates at letsrecycle.com’s London Conference (10 March), Mr Gover offered an update on the resource charity’s work on behalf of Defra to examine ways to improve consistency of recycling collections, adding that there were around 20 different recycling systems in the capital alone.

(l-r): Andy Rees, Welsh Government's head of waste strategy, Linda Cricton, WRAP's head of resource management, Marcus Gover, WRAP director, and councillor Clyde Loakes, session chair
(l-r): Andy Rees, Welsh Government’s head of waste strategy, Linda Crichton, WRAP’s head of resource management, Marcus Gover, WRAP director, and councillor Clyde Loakes, session chair

He noted that WRAP is looking to ‘hold the hand of five or six’ local authorities who would be willing to adopt the charity organisation’s recommendations in order to provide case studies of how recycling can be improved by adopting more ‘standardised’ collection systems.

In 2014/15, overall recycling across London’s 32 boroughs dropped 0.8% to 33.1% – casting doubt over whether the city will be likely to meet the UK 50% recycling target by 2020. However, it is thought that London has even privately agreed with Defra that it might only be expected to reach 40%.

Mr Gover said: “90% of people understand why they should recycle and want to recycle, we just need to make it easy for them and stop them becoming confused.”

Examples

He gave examples of the cost and results of three options for collecting municipal waste: commingling; twin-stream; and multi-stream.

Mr Gover commented: “If the whole of England changed to commingling we would achieve a 52% recycling rate by 2025, add 3% to the cost and we would have to work hard to ensure that system complies with legislation. A twin-stream system with separate glass would cost 10% more and achieve 50% by 2025.”

“Multi-stream recycling gives the lowest cost option collecting six materials including food waste. The collection vehicles are much cheaper to buy and much cheaper to operate so this is the lowest risk approach.”

Mr Gover however insisted that the consistency drive is “not a diktat” for councils and will apply to all areas of the supply chain where waste is generated.

Asked how separate collections could work in London’s flats which typically have poor access to recycling facilities and transient populations, he said: “Milan has very successfully built in a multi-stream system in the city where the population speaks around nine different languages.”

Andy Rees, head of
Andy Rees explained the Welsh Government’s view on commingling in his presentation on the Welsh Government’s Blueprint

Richard Tracey, London Assembly member and chair of the London Waste & Recycling Board (LWARB), meanwhile suggested that residents in his borough of Wandsworth have adopted the message that food waste should be disposed of as refuse in order to be “burnt” as use for energy at the Belvedere incinerator in South East London. He added it would be “very hard” to talk people out of this mindset.

Wales

Mr Gover’s enthusiasm for kerbside sort was echoed by the Welsh Government’s Andy Rees, who also explained the Welsh Government’s view on commingling in his presentation on how Wales was striving to meet its 70% target by 2025. Wales had generally moved to kerbside sort, he indicated. He added that the Government was ‘working with’ the few remaining boroughs in the principality which continue to provide commingled collections.

Asked how urban recycling problems in London compared to the more rural Wales, Mr Rees insisted that Cardiff city council has had to overcome similar storage issues for terraced houses and flats while maintaining separate collections.

Share this article with others

Subscribe for free

Subscribe to receive our newsletters and to leave comments.

Back to top

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest waste and recycling news straight to your inbox.

Subscribe
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.