letsrecycle.com

‘Disappointed’: Dorset council not invited to Wimborne incinerator meeting

Dorset council’s cabinet member for planning, Shane Bartlett has said he is disappointed at “being denied the opportunity” to speak at a BCP meeting regarding a proposed waste incinerator in Wimborne.

The proposal includes the demolition and removal of existing structures, as well as the erection of a Carbon Capture Energy-from-Waste heat and power facility located in Canford Resource Park.

Bartlett said: “I had requested the opportunity to speak at BCP Council’s planning committee meeting to present Dorset council’s position on a matter of shared importance. Regrettably, that request was denied, despite our appeal for special consideration given the joint waste management responsibilities between our councils.

“I find this decision deeply disappointing. While I respect BCP Council’s autonomy, it is frustrating to be unable to represent the interests of our residents, especially when the proposed waste incinerator could significantly impact both our communities and local ecology.”

Although he was not present for the meeting, Bartlett released the following statement on behalf of Dorset council:

“Members of the committee will be aware that the Canford site is allocated in the BCP and Dorset Waste Plan which was adopted by both authorities in 2019. Dorset council welcomes the properly planned location of strategic residual waste treatment facilities and recognises the benefits of the Canford site as an allocated site in terms of co-locating waste treatment facilities in a location that is well-placed to meet both the needs of BCP council and Dorset council.”

Factors to consider

He continued: “We fully recognise that the proposed development would support the circular economy of keeping materials in use, with nearby facilities at Whites Pit, while also reducing transportation, which supports national and local waste policies. Having a range and choice of options can also assist in securing a competitive price for council municipal waste streams, which is to the benefit of taxpayers.

“Whilst Dorset council has no objection in principle to the intensification of this site, the planning committee should satisfy itself that the details of the proposal are also acceptable when having regard to the strategic need for waste management, taking account of the most up to date position. In this regard I want to draw to the committee’s attention some specific points which I would ask you to consider in reaching your decision.

  1. The Waste Plan identifies a need for 232,000 tonnes of residual waste treatment capacity in the plan area (both BCP and Dorset council) by 2033 to meet the needs of the area. Since the plan was adopted, an Energy-from-Waste plant has been granted planning permission for the Powerfuel plant in Portland by the Secretary of State following an appeal. This would have a capacity of around 200,000 tonnes. If the Canford proposal is granted planning permission, this would bring the total permitted capacity for residual waste treatment to around 460,000 tonnes, should both become operational. It will be important for this level of provision to be justified having regard to both the waste hierarchy and the proximity principle.
  2. As part of the Emissions Trading Scheme, which comes into effect in 2028, there will be a further carbon tax on plastics, potentially driving a higher share of residual waste out of those waste streams that were forecast when the Waste Plan was adopted.
  3. It is noted that the site is situated in the Green Belt and very special circumstances are needed for inappropriate development. With a potential supply in excess of need, if both developments become operational, the planning committee therefore needs to be satisfied very special circumstances indeed do apply in this case.”

To conclude, Bartlett asked that the points raised by Dorset council are “fully considered” regarding the application, which will give said council the assurances that the plans will “contribute positively” to the waste hierarchy and meeting local needs.

Share this article with others

Subscribe for free

Subscribe to receive our newsletters and to leave comments.

Back to top

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest waste and recycling news straight to your inbox.

Subscribe
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.