banner small

Report questions reliability of Welsh reject rates

Report questions reliability of Welsh reject rates

“Unusually low” reject rates for dry recyclables in Wales could indicate that the level of contamination is being underreported, an independent review has found.

And, there is an ‘important distinction’ between end destinations reported by councils on WasteDataFlow and where the materials are finally reprocessed to achieve end-of-waste status.

Welsh flag
The Eunomia report looks at inconsistencies in reporting of end destinations for recyclables in Wales

The findings have been laid out in Eunomia’s Recycling Destinations Data Review, which was commissioned by the Welsh Government to ascertain the degree to which councils were able to track their recyclables to a final end destination in 2014/15.

The report used WasteDataFlow data submitted by local authorities, as well as interviews held with recycling officers, reprocessors and stakeholders.

Reject losses include any material that is collected for recycling but subsequently sent to landfill or energy recovery, including non-recyclable materials set out for collection as well as materials that could not be adequately separated out and reprocessed.

Losses

Remarkably, the study found that losses associated with the processing of organic and dry recyclables only amounted to 1.3% of the total quantity of recyclables collected for recycling from the kerbside in 2014/15.

Some 40,650 tonnes – or 7.2% – of the total quantity of dry recyclables were reported as reject losses coming out of materials recycling facilities (MRFs) in Wales, and the reject rate for reprocessors amounted to 0.90% of the total quantity collected.

Eunomia concludes that local authorities have succeeded in tracking 90% of all dry recyclables and organics to an actual end destination – with just under half of the total tonnage collected reported to have gone to end destination facilities based in Wales.

But, the consultancy also argued there is a ‘general trend’ among Welsh councils that reject rates are being underreported – with ‘little effort’ being invested in accounting for or tracking losses other than at MRFs.

“The reality is that with continually shifting markets authorities will have to remain committed to gathering the necessary data and pushing contractors to do the same.”


Recycling Destinations Data Review

Data

The report states: “The reality is that with continually shifting markets authorities will have to remain committed to gathering the necessary data and pushing contractors to do the same. There are no doubt some challenges to a obtaining the required information but it is hoped that with the recommendations presented below these may be lessened and the efficiency of the reporting process improved.”

Latest figures provided by the Welsh Government show that collectively the 22 councils are recycling around 57% of waste. However, progress towards meeting its statutory recycling targets has slowed in recent quarters – with concern growing over the councils’ ability to reach 58% by the end of the year (see letsrecycle.com story).

Despite some uncertainty surrounding the contamination rates, Eunomia’s report appears to support the Welsh Government’s commitment to push separate sorting. It claims that ‘the mixing of numerous waste streams’ made it hard to ‘reliably track’ the onward flow of municipal waste – which contributes to poor reject rate reporting.

Related Link

Recycling Destinations Data Review

Register for free to comment

Subscribe to receive our newsletters and to leave comments.

The Blog Box

Back to top

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest waste and recycling news straight to your inbox.

Subscribe
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.