banner small

Government “would welcome” ideas on electronics eco-design

The government has said it would welcome ideas on how to make electronics manufacturers more individually responsible for the waste their products generate.

Speaking yesterday in the House of Lords, the director of sustainable development and regulation for the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Tony Pedrotti, agreed with the view from peers that so-called individual producer responsibility (IPR) would drive “eco-design” in the electronics sector.

IPR is a marvelous idea and would drive eco-design – and would be pure producer responsibility. But how can we do it? No European country is doing this.

 
Tony Pedrotti, BERR

But Mr Pedrotti said that bringing in an IPR system within the current waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) system would be extremely difficult.

“If you want total IPR you will have to sort out every single product and work out which manufacturer made it,” he said.

“IPR is a marvelous idea and would drive eco-design – and would be pure producer responsibility. But how can we do it? No European country is doing this – they may have it on the statute books, but no European country is doing it,” Mr Pedrotti declared.

The BERR director was addressing the Lords Science and Technology Committee yesterday, as part of its inquiry into waste reduction.

“No incentive”

During the hearing, Professor Lord Lewis of Newnham raised his concern that within the existing WEEE Regulations there was “no incentive” to manufacturers to design their electronic products to be easier to recycle or less wasteful.

This was because the Regulations require manufacturers to arrange collections of their products collectively via compliance schemes.

In reply to the peer's concerns, Mr Pedrotti said the Department's new WEEE Advisory Group – expected to be announced soon – would look into the issue of IPR, while he said compliance schemes have already been asked for their views.

“What we have asked producer compliance schemes, who are working with producers on WEEE, is to put recommendations to us by the end of the year on how we could implement this,” he said.

“We would welcome any ideas from the advisory body and producers on how we can move to such a system,” said Mr Pedrotti, who later suggested IPR could form part of the European-level review of the WEEE Directive expected next year.

WEEE collection

During the hearing yesterday, Lord Lewis also suggested that something should be done to make it easier for householders to recycle their old electrical products – particularly smaller appliances.

The former Cambridge chemistry professor and Cambridgeshire resident complained: “The WEEE Directive has delegated to local authorities the actual point of collection. Now if I want to get rid of something I would have to drive out to the edge of Cambridge to get rid of it – whereas I could just put it in the bin and that would not be illegal.”

Register for free to comment

Subscribe to receive our newsletters and to leave comments.

The Blog Box

Back to top

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest waste and recycling news straight to your inbox.

Subscribe
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.