The report, carried out by Network Recycling, a subsidiary of the Community Recycling Network, emphasises the need for investment in CA sites. If the UK spent an additional 215 million on CA sites, particularly in the provision of more staff, the nation's sites “could achieve a recycling rate of 60% within three years.”
But the report also suggested a number of low-cost ways that could effectively improve recycling rates at the sites, including increasing the range of separate bulk recyclables and small recyclables areas; improving signage; increasing staff levels and continuing kerbside collections – which have been shown to encourage good recycling habits.
The study found that the use of height barriers to control trade abuse is “ineffective” and “actually decreases recycling rates”. And, it said “at 25%, the composition of garden waste in the CA waste stream is lower than previously thought.”
It is hoped the findings of the study will enable local authorities and contractors to prioritise investment aimed at improving CA diversion rates. Prioritisation at CA sites is at an all-time high since the introduction of statutory recycling targets in 2001 thrust them into the limelight.
Layouts
In most cases, it says, good traffic directions and road markings, along with an efficient positioning and ordering of bins, and possibly the launch of a one way system, can turn an inefficient site into one that runs well. Though, it adds, that there are “some chronically detrimental layouts in place, and substantial redevelopment maybe the only key to improving recycling rates at the types of sites.”
Also noted in the report, funded by Biffaward through the Landfill Tax Credit Scheme, was the opportunity for CA sites to expand the separation of waste electrical and electronic equipment in line with the WEEE Directive.
A conference will be held in Birmingham on March 25 to discuss the findings of this report, which can be viewed in full at www.networkrecycling.co.uk/casites.
Subscribe for free