| The way forward for steel packaging recycling in UK (07.12.04)
Claudia Cahalane talks to John May about his ambitions for
maximising the amount of steel packaging recycling in the UK.
Manager of Corus Steel Packaging Recycling John May was
recently nominated to win a letsrecycle.com
award for his continued efforts to increase levels
of steel can recycling in the UK. To many this
will come as no surprise as he takes every
opportunity to encourage local authorities to
collect steel cans.
|
Chemistry graduate
John May has been manager of Corus
Steel Packaging for six years
|
|
A chemistry graduate, Mr May has worked in the
steel industry for many years, the last six in his
current role at Corus.
In October Corus increased the amount it pays
for a tonne of steel cans at its CanRoute centres
from £60 to £75 — a move enabled by an upward
trend in ferrous scrap prices driven largely by
overseas demand for scrap. Mr May estimates that
the UK is currently recycling half of the 700,000
tonnes of steel packaging available in the waste
stream (44.5% in 2003) and he hopes the CanRoute
price will provide an extra incentive for councils
to steel packaging.
Ferrous scrap is used in the two types of steel
making. Electric Arc takes 100% recycled
steel and is used at Corus' Rotherham and
Sheffield plants. The Basic Oxygen
steel making process, used at Corus plants on
Teeside and at Scunthorpe and Port Talbot, uses an average of 25% recycled steel.
Considerable potential
Only 2% of steel currently recovered in the UK
comes from steel cans, the remaining 98% is from
other sources such as end-of-life vehicles yet
there is considerable potential to recover more
from steel cans from the waste stream, Mr May
explains "There are about 400 million tonnes
of scrap steel recycled across the world each
year, so the need for waste steel is essential.
The steel packaging in the domestic waste stream
currently makes up about 5% of steel scrap
available in the UK so there
is the potential to secure about double the amount
currently recovered from the
domestic waste stream."
But is there a real need to put in such a
marked and persistent effort to get this material
out of the waste stream, when its potential in the
scrap metal industry does not represent a huge
portion of what could be used in steel making?
Mr May explains that because of the packaging
waste regulations, the need is indeed a real one.
Under the regulations, a minimum amount of steel
packaging needs to be recycled in order for steel
packaging producers and food and drinks companies
and retailers, to comply with the rules through
Packaging Waste Recovery Notes (PRNs) for the
steel which they have been involved in putting on
the market.
We have data on the amount of packaging
recovered for the first three quarters — if we
continue the trend we would be slightly above
targets.
Latest figures
The latest packaging figures from the
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs,
suggest that steel reprocessors would have to
recycle slightly more than they have in their
third quarter — just under 79,000 tonnes — to
meet the full-year target this year (342,361
tonnes) but Mr May believes steel should be on
track to meet its targets this year.
"We have data on the amount recovered for
the first three quarters — if we continue the
trend we would be slightly above targets. But we
have been warned that there might be a shortage of
shipping vessels for the rest of the year to
transport steel overseas (where about half of the
UK's steel packaging reprocessing currently
happens), so this may have some impact on
figures."
|
Inside the
Corus steel plant at Port Talbot, South Wales
|
|
Even though Corus' results are encouraging,
there is no room to sit back, suggests Mr May.
"We are looking ahead to 2008 targets, when
54% of steel needs to be processed and further
still to 2012 — we can't take our foot off the
gas for a minute, we don't want to lose
momentum."
Things are moving, but he is keen to express
that there is still a long way to go. He says the
company is working hard to draw as much steel
packaging out of the waste stream as possible, but
more could be done by the companies and councils
Corus works with, to streamline the infrastructure
around the collection and recovery of cans.
Contaminants
"Firstly, we rarely turn steel packaging
away, but it doesn't always come to us in the best
state possible," explains Mr May. "We
get bales from MRFs where the steel isn't
separated properly from contaminants — there are
sometimes plastic and paper in amongst it. These
are mostly from dirty MRFs."
He also believes that more could be done to
maximise the recovery of steel packaging from
energy-from-waste plants and MBT facilities. Steel
can be magnetically extracted from the ash at EfW
facilities, but he says that when the material is
extracted, there is still about 35% of ash per
tonne of material. "Then we have to send it
for tromelling, cleaning up and re-baling and this
is paid for out of PRN revenue."
In his view, what would be preferable is for
this material to be treated as a resource rather
than a dirty by-product. "It would be ideal
if new technology plants for EfW could put a
clean-up facility on the back end." Mr May
points to the amount paid by Corus for a tonne of
dirty cans from an incinerator (around £20), to a
tonne of clean cans (£75) as evidence that it
could be worth the while of EfW operators to
consider these measures.
A similar principle applies to mechanical
biological treatment facility (MBT) operators.
"We are keeping a close eye on MBT facilities
because it is very easy to separate steel out of
these processes, again with magnets."
Residents will perceive that they are
receiving a better, more comprehensive service.
"I think managers of MBT facilities and
future MBT facilities should think about
marketability of the products they can get from
the process. They need to think of the plant as a
resource plant, and not just a cheap alternative
to landfill. I believe operators do agree with us
on this point, but we need real action on
producing good quality recyclables from these
plants," says Mr May.
Vision
Ultimately his vision is that the recycling of
steel packaging, like other steel recycling from
engineering processes and car manufacturers, will
become common practice one day. On a final note he
reminds local authorities of the significant role
they play in recycling of steel packaging, saying
there is much to be gained in collecting the
material.
"Though cans are only about 1% of the
waste stream, if you are going to set up a mixed
collection, you should include cans, because of
their high value and because residents will
perceive that they are receiving a better, more
comprehensive service," he encourages. Mr May
says that any extra money that goes towards
collecting cans is recouped by the amount paid for
them from reprocessors, and the savings made in
avoided disposal.
A new Department of Trade and Industry funded
study, the results of which are due to be released
soon, will further quantify the benefits of
collecting cans for local authorities, he says.
"We would like to think that soon steel packaging recycling, and recycling of
packaging generally, will be fully integrated into
the UK's waste management system."
|