| Seeking the perfect future,
the latest Biffa book travels the Yellow
Brick Road
(21.10.02)
The need to be visionary in the way effective
UK policies are developed for dealing with
waste and resources, is the theme in the latest
publication from Biffa, writes Steve Eminton.
In Future Perfect, the analogy of the Yellow
Brick Road – in deference to Walt Disney – is
used as the route to successful delivery of
a sustainable and integrated waste strategy
for the UK.
The concept is developed in what is the fifth
of a series of books produced by Biffa Waste
Services, inspired by the analysis and research
work driven by the waste management company’s
development director, Peter Jones.
Running to 105 pages, this latest book – published
on October 21 2002, is also available on the
company’s website at www.biffa.co.uk
Route map
In the forward to the book, Martin Bettington,
Biffa managing director, notes that Future
Perfect "provides a possible route map which charts how
our world might be – operationally and financially for waste management
in 2020. It is designed to present a robust message to government – emphasising
that more strategic approaches are long overdue."
The book has three key stages: one is a look
at the different ways waste could be handled
between now and the year 2020; then it looks
at what Mr Jones terms the "blockages" which
both aid and hinder the achievement of solutions;
and thirdly the importance of waste to industry
and the public.
The Options
According to Future Perfect, option one of high recycling and high landfill
is the cheapest but more likely only to be a transition phase. This is
on the basis that the Landfill Directive and financial liability requirements
and questions about the sustainability of landfill will all lead to a contraction
of capacity of landfill.
| Future/Option |
Landfill |
Composted |
Energy |
Recovered
(= recycled) |
Mtpa |
Today
|
65% |
2% |
3% |
30% |
120 |
| 1 High landfill
and recycling |
42% |
8% |
12% |
38% |
120 |
| 2 High energy
and recycling |
10% |
15% |
35% |
40% |
120 |
| 3 High composting
and recycling |
10% |
35% |
15% |
40% |
120 |
| 4 High energy
and composting |
8% |
36% |
31% |
25% |
361 |
Option two of high recycling and high energy
from waste is the second most expensive but seen
by Biffa as "the most commercial realistic" given
future probable trends in the value of recovered
materials and renewable energy, either in response
to possible resource taxation or to hardening
real prices offered from tradable permits, especially
on energy.
High composting with high recycling – option
three – is the most expensive and also raises
big questions about the ability of the planning
system to cope with necessary growth in the number
of plants. Biffa estimate that if this approach
was adopted each of the 360 large landfill sites – handling
today an average of 300,000 tonnes per annum
(tpa) will need to be replaced by between 5 and
10 energy composting or recycling facilities.
Option four is high energy recovery and high
composting, a route which could be followed if
the waste industry was to handle large volumes
of agricultural and forestry waste.
Isle of Wight
All the options are examined in great detail in appendix one of the book. The
message is clear, doing nothing is not an option and landfill will have a
reduced role in the future. The book shies away from spelling out the option
to be pursued but does note that high recycling and high energy are the most
commercially viable. The Isle of Wight, where Biffa has an integrated waste
management contract which includes an incinerator, is given as a case study.
Blockages
Attention then turns to some of the obstacles that need to be overcome so options
can be achieved. In the book Mr Jones is adamant about the need for what
he terms "the actors in the drama" to act. He sees them currently
as blockages which need urgent attention.
- Government departments: must move away from
treating the environment on a cross cutting
basis in terms of energy, industry policy,
transport, health and education and policing.
- Environment Agency: needs significant retraining
and a big shift into a more cohesive integrated
approach able to handle new facilities. Privatisation
of some duties may be needed.
- Industry: needs to act on producer responsibility.
- Local authorities: need to develop cohesive
waste strategy plans. 300 landfill sites could
close and be replaced by as many as 3,000 smaller
sites.
- The Treasury: needs to make some fundamental
decisions and need to recognise that direct
costs of £1 billion to £2 billion a year are
looming. "Creating inefficient collection
systems by passing the responsibility for solutions
to hundreds of overloaded local authorities
through central state subsidies is not in the
interest of national efficiency."
- Professional institutions, such as the Chartered
Institute of Waste Management are seen as a
silent professional constituency which needs
to be consulted more proactively.
- NGOs. These are seen as occupying the moral
high ground but have a growing responsibility
to develop proper objectivity and buy-in when
it comes to delivering economically as well
as environmentally realistic options.
The Yellow Brick Road
All this leads to the Yellow Brick Road. A picture of a winding road towards
a sunny 2020 is drawn, but there are three gates in the way. The first is
open, the second broken and in need of repair and the third is "public
dissemination and acceptance".
This is where the vision of Future Perfect starts
to become clear. There is no hesitation on the
part of Biffa. Current performance by regulators,
central government and across waste producers
is erratic in an atmosphere of "distrust,
suspicion, ignorance and failed policy initiatives
without any overarching understanding of a common
binding framework". The book warns that
the waste issue will become more of an economic
and political hot potato than it is today. And,
a lack of political support for integrated environmental
management within the Cabinet is cited as a problem.
In terms of the Yellow Brick Road, the first gate is
open and labelled "Technology".
A key argument in the book is that technology
does exist to handle waste. Mr Jones says that
while new systems continue to arrive, and try
to make the jump from laboratory scale to commercial
operation, it is clear that there are no technical
barriers to achieving a high level of excellence
in recovering resources from waste.
"What is needed," he says, "is
the economic infrastructure and scale to stimulate
technology application within a framework of
robust regulatory control, monitoring and reporting."
The second gate – broken
and in need of repair – signifies government
and regulators. Ramshackle and cobbled together,
these consist of competing objectives from difference
government departments and a regulator which
lacks funds for key tasks.
The book argues for sectorally driven strategies
based on distinct supply chains with support
of the government, the regulator and the waste
industry.
The third gate is
barred and bolted and, says Biffa, reflects the
public which is "bewitched, muddled and
bewildered". This is caused by warring between
government, industry, the waste sector and NGOs.Mr
Jones argues that there is a need to define a
broad area of consensus so there is a more comprehensive,
constructive and understandable package of options
offered to the public as a whole.
MRFs and kerbside collection
The book provides a mass of data and commentary, touching on all aspects of
waste management. On recycling, Biffa’s opinion that it is best to separate
materials as early as possible in the recovery stage.
"The householder is ideally placed to act
in a way in which dry recyclables and organic
materials are kept out of the waste, reducing
both contamination and the quantity of residual
waste for final disposal. This can capture a
high level of the available materials in a form
which would be welcomed by many processors circumventing
any need for MRFs, which tend to be both labour
and capital intensive."
Conclusion
The book provides so much data that it will undoubtedly be an important contribution
to the Strategy Unit review which is due to be published in November 2002.
Future Perfect hints, cajoles and promotes many approaches to better waste
management.
It is both a wake-up call and a tool to deliver
a more perfect future. But, no one solution is
actively promoted. As the book says, "This
publication has been produced with the objective
of enlightening that debate – not in terms of
defining the ideal option (there isn’t one) – but
rather in terms of bringing all the relevant
facts together under the most comprehensive umbrella
so far produced in this country to date".
|